Sunday 24 April 2016

Stereotypes Of LGBT's By The Media

When LGBT (Lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender) characters first came on screens it was in the 70’s. They were either “coming out” or being portrayed as having something wrong with them. But interestingly were all played by straight actors. As years went on more stereotypes were added to LGBT characters. As a gay the media portrays them to be, very flamboyant, not athletic, loves musicals, very sassy, they sleep around, don’t seem to stay in relationships for too long and the main one fashion is their life. In majority of women’s TV shows were a gay is a character, they are to be “the gay best friend”. The one that is always there, talks about everything, gives great advice on relationships and fashion. But never really seen in a relationship themselves. As an example the TV show “Will and Grace” show all these stereotypes. And even though this would be an old show it is still a prime example of media’s stereotypes. A more recent show that still uses stereotypes is “Unbreakable Kimmy Schmidt”.

As lesbians are portrayed in media to be butch, manly, feminists, cheaters, again don’t stay in relationships for too long and again like gays sleep around a lot. This I feel is no longer the case in the last few years. Lesbians have come more diverse. In my opinion I think that lesbians have left the media stereotypes, as TV viewers may be more open to lesbians then gays. I feel that men would be more comfortable and acceptable watching lesbians on screen rather than gays. A prime example of all this is “Orange is the new black”. Here we have a show based on lesbians and bisexual women. This is a huge hit with men and women. As for shows that are based on gays I cannot say there is.



LGBT characters on television admittedly have come a long over the years. But still have a lot further to go, especially gay stereotypes. Not all gays hate sports or doing “manly” stuff. And hopefully in the next 10 to 20 years we do get to see a change.

Friday 22 April 2016

Stereotypes Of Masculinity In The Media

The media plays a huge role in people’s opinions and thoughts without people realizing. If you were to ask a child what the role of a man was, chances are you would get an answer like “A man is to provide for his family” or “A man is to protect his family and be strong and focused”. We first start to form thoughts and opinions at a young age. Here is a video on Disney movies that most kids would have seen a number of times that would have influenced their minds:



From this video kids learn that women belong to men, they have to be strong and then fighting another man is to prove your masculinity. With media so big it has a huge influence in these thoughts. And it is not until we are older that we realize that what we see on TV is not actually how men are. The media portrays men to have a number of stereotypes, power/control, being strong, and an alpha and as we all know a lack of emotion. Not only are these stereotypes but this is what people are defining a “real” man as. If a man does not meet these then are they a man. Really once you are male then you are a man no matter what. But thanks to the media the title of being a man has requirements and expectations. This then leaves males to try put a front on and it’s not until they find trust in someone that they can feel they can show the true them. As a society we should not have to hide. Here is a link to a page that has a video that men have talked about masculinity and their views on it.


These stereotypes are still dominant but in the last few years I have seen a change in this. We see that the roles of stereotypes have not only been broke but near flipped around. If we take Melissa and Joey for example. Melissa is a politician, she provides for her niece and nephew. She is the one that is strong and in power. But Joey has fallen from power and has become a “manny”. He is the one that cooks, keeps the place clean and who the teens go to if they need advice. This is a prime example of what life is really like now a days. We see that men do have feelings and that women can be on a higher level than men and that men are ok with this.


We now see that media is slowly changing their stereotypes, but manly in sitcoms. In order for these stereotypes to change us we need reality TV to show the real side of men but personally I don’t think this will be happening anytime soon.

Wednesday 20 April 2016

Is "Reality TV" Really Reality

In the last few years reality TV has become the most popular genre on our TV’s. As you can see from the bar chart below it holds the highest percentage. Unfortunately I could not find figures for 2012 to 2015. But I can tell you that the most popular reality TV shows according to IMDb are, keeping up with the Kardashians, Dancing with the stars and Dance Moms. 

http://www.statista.com/statistics/201565/most-popular-genres-in-us-primetime-tv/



The definition of reality TV is “Television programmes in which ordinary people are continuously filmed, designed to be entertaining rather than informative.” But what many viewers may not know is that reality TV has become more scripted as in a sense of writers creating plot lines and situations that will create conflict. Editors can also edit the clips to intensify situations more than what they really were.

For example, when a viewer sees an argument between two people on screen and the camera cuts to a clip where we can’t see them talk but we can still hear them, chances are that what they are saying was said in a different conversation and the editor placed it to an argument to exaggerate the situation more. This is done so often that they have even created a name for this, frankenbiting.

Here is a video about reality TV lies:

But why is reality TV so popular? The reason it’s so popular in production is because it’s cheap to make. The stars that are in these shows get paid less as they are not trained actors. The editing of the show also has low pay and the writers don’t need to do out script after script. For the viewer’s popularity, viewers are not fully aware of all the set ups and believe that all these situations and arguments that reality TV stars get themselves into are for real. This then intrigues the viewer and leads them to wanting to know more. It also allows a viewer to escape their everyday life and watch the life of another unravel. As a reality viewer myself, I find that I get engrossed with the drama and even though I know the situation is not real or fixed, I still feel myself needing to know more. It does become an addiction and I feel that’s what gets the viewers. Reality TV also gives a viewer to compare their own lives to others, which can lead to a boost in happiness.

I will be conducting an analysis on the reality TV show Dance Moms. The reason for this is because I didn’t want to focus on the partying aspects or the cheating that happens in most reality TV shows. With Dance Moms we see the different views from the mothers, from the teacher and also from the kids which I feel is something that most reality TV shows don’t have. Since I have started this analysis I have found myself wanting to know more and have actually started watching the show. Down below is a trailer tease for Dance Moms and also scripting secrets from Dance Moms.



Tuesday 15 March 2016

"No Technology Day" Came And Gone

Well no technology day came and went . as I aspected it was really difficult. I managed to make it till 5 with no technology, better than I thought I would do to be honest. So I am pretty pleased with that.
One thing I found really syeage was that the house was supper quite. Usually there would be a TV on or a radio but on Tuesday I had nothing. It was really weird to just be in silence. I remember one time that the ESB went out and even then I had to put a radio on as it was to quite.
The no social media was the easier part of the day. I'm not that attached to them I find myself just scrolling through Facebook just because I'm just waiting about really. But with the no phone, this was hard. For me I use my phone for time and Id say I look at the time 20 times a day. I had to keep asking the time so I'd say everyone was glad when I was done. Over all the no technology day was really hard to do. If I had to do it more than a day I think I would go crazy. I'm not one to be constantly in need of communication with others but the TV I don't think I could go without. 

Friday 19 February 2016

Prep For "No Technology Day"

As we all know technology plays a huge role in our lives. You could say that its technology that makes the world go round. People these days expect to be able to communicate with others at any given moment. Whereas back in the day it would have been every few days or even over a year in some circumstances. With such easy access to technology we do tend to take it for granted.

So to show how much our lives are given to technology, as a class next week we will all be taking part in a "No Technology Day". What does this consist of? Well this means from the second I wake Tuesday morning I can’t use my phone, my laptop or even watch TV. It even comes down to not using the microwave for food so hopefully I will remember to take out the food that morning to defrost. But on a scale of 1 to 10, (10 being difficult) I would say 10 is where Tuesday will be at. Out of the items I have mentioned above I feel that no TV will be the hardest. Like even if you’re not watching TV it’s still on in the background for noise.



To prepare myself for the day I plan to print out all the documents needed to finish off my Branding and Packaging report as it is due 2 days after. This might case difficulty as I will not be able to do research if needed on the day. Or even keep in contact with the group as it is a group report. As for what to do when I'm left with no TV, a book? I do have a book ("Life's that way" by Jim Beaver) that I keep meaning to finish. So this could be the day to get it done and finally be happy that I have completed it. No internet I think I could do as I only really browse when there is nothing else to do so if I keep busy I should be fine, hopefully. I guess we will find out how it goes next week. 

Monday 8 February 2016

How Culture Is Related To Social Location

In today's world we see the world around us in a range of views:

  • Our social location - where you are situated in relation to others. (Whether it’s race, religion, education etc.)
  • Worldview - are can be shaped by our social, cultural, and personal experiences. Which are influenced by our social location.
  • Confirmation bias - the impulse to take new evidence as confirmation of one's existing beliefs or theories.
  • Fundamental attribution error - the tendency to explain someone else on their behaviour based on internal factors (personality or disposition) and to underestimate the influence that external factors (situational influences) have on another person's behaviour.
For this blog post I will be focusing on social locations and how it can effect our culture. But first of all what is "Culture"? Culture basically gives a society its identity from its beliefs, its language, its customs, its laws and its cuisine. It is these that distinguish one group of people from another.

 

But how is culture related to your social location? Well for example, in your social location you have 8 institutions:

  • Family
  • Education
  • Religion
  • The Media
  • Health
  • Government
  • Economy
  • The Natural World

Each all linking under culture in one form or another. Not everyone has these 8 in their social location but there is a 99% chance that they have seen it in other family or friends social location. Each society has its own culture. For me I live in a very rural area about 90% of it being the natural world. So for me my culture would be based around my family and from them I would get their beliefs and their food culture. Whereas someone living in the city would have a wider culture of beliefs as there would be many more different cultures of people. And would experience more food cultures than I would as they have more accesses to them. Depending on your social location your culture will differ but this does not mean one person is at a greater advantage than the other. Both social locations will have their own benefits just like they will have their disadvantages.